- #Pro ii simulation two compressor lab software#
- #Pro ii simulation two compressor lab plus#
- #Pro ii simulation two compressor lab simulator#
The concentrations of fifteen percent more » of the species present in the primary output stream were changed by more than 50%, relative to Electrolyte NRTL, when ideality was assumed (2) The current baseline model provides a good start for estimating mass balances and performing integrated process optimization because it contains several key species, uses a mechanistic electrolyte thermodynamic model, and is based on a reasonable process configuration and (3) Appreciable improvement to model fidelity can be realized by expanding the species list and the list of chemical and phase transformations.
As assessment of the capability of the model to mechanistically predict product stream compositions was made, and fidelity gaps and opportunities for model enhancement were identified, resulting in the following conclusions: (1) Appreciable benefit is derived from using an activity coefficient model for electrolyte solution thermodynamics rather than assuming ideality (unity assumed for all activity coefficients). The preliminary process configuration and its representation in ASPEN are described.
#Pro ii simulation two compressor lab plus#
« lessĪ steady-state model of the Sodium-Bearing Waste steam reforming process at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory has been performed using the commercial ASPEN Plus process simulator.
#Pro ii simulation two compressor lab software#
The final software decisions provide flexibility: they involve annual rather than multi-year licensing, and they include periodic re-assessment. It was concluded from "road tests" that ASPEN Plus appears to satisfy the project's technical requirements the best and is worth acquiring. The candidate list more » was narrowed to three final contenders: ASPEN Plus 10.2, PRO/II 5.11, and CHEMCAD 5.1.0. Twelve simulators were investigated with varying degrees of scrutiny. And second, determine if the best is good enough to justify the cost. First, determine the steady-state simulation software that best, albeit not completely, satisfies the requirements envelope. The aim of the selection process was two-fold.
#Pro ii simulation two compressor lab simulator#
Multiple waste forms, treatment ambiguity, and the uniqueness of both the waste chemistries and alternative treatment technologies result in a large set of potential technical requirements that no commercial simulator can totally satisfy. The process used for selecting a steady-state process simulator under conditions of high uncertainty and limited time is described. The final software decisions provide flexibility: they involve annual rather than multi-year licensing, and they include periodic = , It was concluded from ''road tests'' that ASPEN Plus appears to satisfy the project's technical requirements the best and is worth acquiring. The candidate list was narrowed to three final contenders: ASPEN Plus 10.2, PRO/II 5.11, and CHEMCAD 5.1.0.